{"id":2157,"date":"2021-11-19T09:49:36","date_gmt":"2021-11-19T09:49:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lynn.global\/?p=2157"},"modified":"2023-03-01T10:52:51","modified_gmt":"2023-03-01T10:52:51","slug":"is-misinformation-getting-worse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lynn.global\/is-misinformation-getting-worse\/","title":{"rendered":"Making sense of misinformation part three: Is misinformation getting worse?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The short answer: yes. Over the past ten years, the challenge of misinformation has entered the public sphere. But Misinformation isn\u2019t a new problem. Nor is it a new term.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Google Ngram Viewer, the word \u2018misinformation\u2019 surfaced in the early 19th century<\/strong><\/a>. Indeed, the 15th volume of Encyclopaedia Perthensis<\/em>, published in 1816, defined misinformation<\/strong><\/a> as \u201cfalse intelligence\u201d or \u201cfalse accounts\u201d. Use of the word plateaued in around 2003, but usage increased again after the bombshells of 2016. And it shows no sign of slowing down.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So what has happened in the last two decades to spark such a spike in misinformation? It is, of course, a significant shift in our \u2018information environment\u2019.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The rise of the internet<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In 2000, the World Bank ran a study on internet use across the globe. The results came in at a humble 7%. A mere 20 years later and that number is close to 60%. Since then, Wikipedia was founded (2001), Twitter was created (2006) and WordPress was launched (2003). Where the vast majority of us once got our news and information from a small number of common, trusted sources (such as newspapers, journals and books \u2013 all of which must go through varyingly rigorous publication methods), suddenly anyone could publish from the comfort of their own home. And they can publish anything.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The danger in these self-published articles is that they can, more often than not, produce websites which have the look and \u2018feel\u2019 of a mainstream publication. That, coupled with the billions of people around the world relying on their social media news feeds to receive the news, results in millions of people putting their trust in false information. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The social media news feeds, of course, have a huge part to play in the dissemination of misinformation. It is their algorithms which determine what content we see on our news feeds. They are not programmed to promote content which will keep us well informed, rather, they show us the content which they think will keep us on the platform longer. Basically, content which drives profits.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The rise of conspiracy theorists<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

We can also understand why it\u2019s gotten worse when we think about conspiracy thinkers<\/strong><\/a>. But what makes people vulnerable to conspiracy thinking?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are 3Cs that increase vulnerability to conspiracy thinking<\/strong><\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n